Number theory
Erdős 208 - log bound
In [Er79] Erdős says perhaps , but he is 'very doubtful'. [Er79] Erdős, Paul, __Some unconventional problems in number theory__. Math. Mag. (1979), 67-70.References
No one has attempted this yet.
Formal statement
Lean type
(fun n => ↑(Erdos208.erdos208.s (n + 1)) - ↑(Erdos208.erdos208.s n)) =O[Filter.atTop] fun n =>
Real.log ↑(Erdos208.erdos208.s n)What you must prove
import FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«208»
import TaskSupport
namespace Bounty
theorem target : fcTypeOfName% "Erdos208.erdos_208.variants.log_bound" := by
sorry
end Bounty
Pinned source: FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/208.lean
- Source type SHA-256
- sha256:f934595c12d4ec6e259b6f51b8f416436bdd092e9e2ce1d85daaa0c54f295023
- Task id
- fc-379fc029-variants-log-bound-f4b3b30352-formalized-v1
- Task commitment
- sha256:00bbacaa394f8d7b0a23e2ab65a879bed141763335e7fcc35badd876913b90f5
Something wrong with this formalization?
A statement that does not faithfully capture the original conjecture is the one real risk here, so we would rather hear about it early - before someone spends weeks on it.