Conjectures.io

Combinatorics

Erdős 282

Let ANA\subseteq \mathbb{N} be an infinite set and consider the following greedy algorithm for a rational x(0,1)x\in (0,1): choose the minimal nAn\in A such that n1/xn\geq 1/x and repeat with xx replaced by x1nx-\frac{1}{n}. If this terminates after finitely many steps then this produces a representation of xx as the sum of distinct unit fractions with denominators from AA. Does this process always terminate if xx has odd denominator and AA is the set of odd numbers?

Formal statement

Lean type

∀ {x : ℚ}, x ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1 → Odd x.den → Erdos282.greedyUnitFractionRem {n | Odd n} x =ᶠ[Filter.atTop] 0

What you must prove

import FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«282»
import TaskSupport

namespace Bounty

theorem target : fcTypeOfName% "Erdos282.erdos_282" := by
  sorry

end Bounty

Pinned source: FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/282.lean

Source type SHA-256
sha256:3e05d2afa31e1b4b47810c7dfbbbaa9b8cf1d58c805a3530813b6093f31113a6
Task id
fc-379fc029-erdos282-erdos-282-f6f4c79ebe-formalized-v1
Task commitment
sha256:8988253214f41db86a4b96963e52ab1f48046fbe6c4b23a0e426c7e1196a2af9

Something wrong with this formalization?

A statement that does not faithfully capture the original conjecture is the one real risk here, so we would rather hear about it early - before someone spends weeks on it.