Number theory
Erdős 456 - part iii
Are there infinitely many primes such that is the only for which ?References
- [Er79e] Erdős, Paul, Some unconventional problems in number theory. Astérisque (1979), 73--82.
No one has attempted this yet.
Formal statement
Lean type
True ↔ {q | Nat.Prime q ∧ ∀ (n : ℕ), Erdos456.m n = q ↔ n = q - 1}.InfiniteWhat you must prove
import FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«456»
import TaskSupport
namespace Bounty
theorem target : fcTypeOfName% "Erdos456.erdos_456.parts.iii" := by
sorry
end Bounty
Pinned source: FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/456.lean
- Source type SHA-256
- sha256:8ceaf9e76ee4bcdc74fdb1532edaca6f235386adaeeadd88e0407a41a4107a18
- Task id
- fc-379fc029-parts-iii-db20e22e31-formalized-v1
- Task commitment
- sha256:e2461c557b1214ea2c8d5d9a3479afba21b2b0bec0082f5681258f948107f067
Something wrong with this formalization?
A statement that does not faithfully capture the original conjecture is the one real risk here, so we would rather hear about it early - before someone spends weeks on it.