Number theory
Erdős 686 - four
Can be written as for some and ?References
- [Er79d] Erdős, P., *Some unconventional problems in number theory*. Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. (1979), 71-80.
No one has attempted this yet.
Formal statement
Lean type
True ↔ ∃ k ≥ 2, ∃ n, ∃ m ≥ n + k, 4 = ↑(∏ i ∈ Finset.Icc 1 k, (m + i)) / ↑(∏ i ∈ Finset.Icc 1 k, (n + i))What you must prove
import FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«686»
import TaskSupport
namespace Bounty
theorem target : fcTypeOfName% "Erdos686.erdos_686.variants.four" := by
sorry
end Bounty
Pinned source: FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/686.lean
- Source type SHA-256
- sha256:ba400ba0844a1182de84df5aa217255c4343091b3aec968e35793bb0e75e8db2
- Task id
- fc-379fc029-variants-four-27f59536d7-formalized-v1
- Task commitment
- sha256:bd2f52489d971db4ae4a8c79e106c7fd3080827a8d4dc72f3154e395da098528
Something wrong with this formalization?
A statement that does not faithfully capture the original conjecture is the one real risk here, so we would rather hear about it early - before someone spends weeks on it.