Combinatorics
Green18.green_18
Suppose that is a finite group, and let be a subset of density . Is it true that there are triples such that all lie in ? Note: A is taken as -dense, i.e. [Au16, Question 2]References
- [Au16] Austin, Tim. "Ajtai–Szemerédi theorems over quasirandom groups." Recent trends in combinatorics. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. 453-484.
- [So13] Solymosi, Jozsef. "Roth-type theorems in finite groups." European Journal of Combinatorics 34.8 (2013): 1454-1458.
- [Go01] Gowers, William T. "A new proof of Szemerédi's theorem." Geometric & Functional Analysis GAFA 11.3 (2001): 465-588.
No one has attempted this yet.
Formal statement
Lean type
True ↔
∀ α > 0,
∃ c > 0,
∃ m₀,
∀ (G : Type u_1) [inst : Group G] [inst_1 : Fintype G] [inst_2 : DecidableEq G] (A : Finset (G × G)),
Fintype.card G ≥ m₀ →
↑A.card ≥ α * ↑(Fintype.card G) ^ 2 → ↑(Green18.numNaiveCorners A) ≥ c * ↑(Fintype.card G) ^ 3What you must prove
import FormalConjectures.GreensOpenProblems.«18»
import TaskSupport
namespace Bounty
theorem target : fcTypeOfName% "Green18.green_18" := by
sorry
end Bounty
Pinned source: FormalConjectures/GreensOpenProblems/18.lean
- Source type SHA-256
- sha256:5a31ee676aa0957a349062ecdb11dfccb340dc34ec96516418e8eed3f7e9c9d0
- Task id
- fc-379fc029-green18-green-18-1150586578-formalized-v1
- Task commitment
- sha256:3df78339cf1b181306b3249bcd8f8588b7054a3feb4e2a0575238a9eca1226cb
Something wrong with this formalization?
A statement that does not faithfully capture the original conjecture is the one real risk here, so we would rather hear about it early - before someone spends weeks on it.